MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566373757

An Act of Genocide: Colonialism and the Sterilization of Aboriginal Women

2016· article· en· W2566373757 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of native studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenocideColonialismIndigenousSterilization (economics)EugenicsReproductive justiceLawGender studiesPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryCriminologyCurrencyAbortion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Karen Stote, An Act of Genocide: Colonialism and the Sterilization of Aboriginal Women. Black Point, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing, 2015. 200 pages. ISBN 978-1-55266-732-3. $25.00 paperback.In An Act of Genocide: Colonialism and the Sterilization of Aboriginal Women, Karen Stote situates the mid-to-late twentieth century coercive sterilization of Native women in a much longer history of colonialism. In just under two-hundred pages, Stote familiarizes readers not only with sterilization, birth control, and abusive abortions (the focus of chapter three) but also with early 20th-century eugenics, Canadian federal Indian policy, and a broader investigation of the history and application of the term genocide. From the book's acknowledgements through its conclusion, An Act of Genocide makes its position clear: is meant as a statement of solidarity with those who have consistently resisted an unjust system which treats all of us poorly and continues to deny Indigenous peoples the right to exist on their own terms... (vii). This text then is not only a study that relays a series of historical moments but one that advances strong arguments with clear political commitments. The author notes in the preface that many people respond to the topic of Indigenous women and coerced sterilization with incredulity. Thus the book seeks not only to demonstrate that this violation of reproductive justice occurred but also to shed light on how and why. Stote maintains that the consistent undermining of Aboriginal women and their reproductive lives through policies and practices like coercive sterilization has been part of a longstanding attack against Indigenous ways of life in an effort to reduce those to whom the federal government has obligations, and in order to gain access to lands and resources (1).The book's first chapter examines the role that Canadian suffragettes and maternal feminists played in upholding rather than dismantling the interconnected systems of capitalism and settler colonialism. Flere Stote notes that a handful of renowned Canadian feminists supported a eugenic framework (some, robustly so). The second chapter provides a brief history of Canadian federal Indian policy with particular attention to the 1876 Indian Act and the ways in which it affected women over the longue duree. The third chapter investigates coercive sterilization and also addresses how the state employed birth control and abortion in ways that denied Indigenous women full reproductive control. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it