MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566373757

An Act of Genocide: Colonialism and the Sterilization of Aboriginal Women

2016· article· en· W2566373757 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Meg Devlin O’Sullivan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of native studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenocideColonialismIndigenousSterilization (economics)EugenicsReproductive justiceLawGender studiesPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryCriminologyCurrencyAbortion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Karen Stote, An Act of Genocide: Colonialism and the Sterilization of Aboriginal Women. Black Point, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing, 2015. 200 pages. ISBN 978-1-55266-732-3. $25.00 paperback.In An Act of Genocide: Colonialism and the Sterilization of Aboriginal Women, Karen Stote situates the mid-to-late twentieth century coercive sterilization of Native women in a much longer history of colonialism. In just under two-hundred pages, Stote familiarizes readers not only with sterilization, birth control, and abusive abortions (the focus of chapter three) but also with early 20th-century eugenics, Canadian federal Indian policy, and a broader investigation of the history and application of the term genocide. From the book's acknowledgements through its conclusion, An Act of Genocide makes its position clear: is meant as a statement of solidarity with those who have consistently resisted an unjust system which treats all of us poorly and continues to deny Indigenous peoples the right to exist on their own terms... (vii). This text then is not only a study that relays a series of historical moments but one that advances strong arguments with clear political commitments. The author notes in the preface that many people respond to the topic of Indigenous women and coerced sterilization with incredulity. Thus the book seeks not only to demonstrate that this violation of reproductive justice occurred but also to shed light on how and why. Stote maintains that the consistent undermining of Aboriginal women and their reproductive lives through policies and practices like coercive sterilization has been part of a longstanding attack against Indigenous ways of life in an effort to reduce those to whom the federal government has obligations, and in order to gain access to lands and resources (1).The book's first chapter examines the role that Canadian suffragettes and maternal feminists played in upholding rather than dismantling the interconnected systems of capitalism and settler colonialism. Flere Stote notes that a handful of renowned Canadian feminists supported a eugenic framework (some, robustly so). The second chapter provides a brief history of Canadian federal Indian policy with particular attention to the 1876 Indian Act and the ways in which it affected women over the longue duree. The third chapter investigates coercive sterilization and also addresses how the state employed birth control and abortion in ways that denied Indigenous women full reproductive control. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of native studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207