MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Eculizumab (ECU) Significantly Improves Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Patients with Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS)

2011· article· en· W2566392458 on OpenAlexaff
Petra Muus, Christoph Licht, Tim Goodship, Larry A. Greenbaum, Camille L. Bedrosian, Chantal Loirat, Christophe Legendre

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtypical hemolytic uremic syndromeEculizumabMedicineThrombotic microangiopathyDialysisInternal medicineClinical trialKidney diseaseGastroenterologyPediatricsComplement systemImmunologyDiseaseAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 4772 Background aHUS is a rare, genetic, life-threatening, disease caused by chronic uncontrolled complement activation, which leads to systemic thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Despite plasma exchange/infusion (PE/PI), >50% of patients (pts) will either die, require kidney dialysis or have permanent renal damage within the first year of diagnosis. In addition to causing progressive organ damage, the uncontrolled complement activation and subsequent TMA might be expected to impact HRQoL. In 2 prospective, controlled, single-arm phase II trials of aHUS pts receiving ECU, a terminal complement inhibitor, TMA was stopped, there was no longer a need for PE/PI or new dialysis. In one of the trials (C08-002), dramatically, 4/5 pts on dialysis permanently discontinued dialysis as of most recent follow-up. The current analysis evaluates the impact of ECU on HRQoL in aHUS pts. Methods In trial C08-002, 17 pts with aHUS resistant to PE/PI (persistent TMA despite ≥4 PE/PI sessions 1 wk before screening) received ECU. In trial C08-003, 20 pts previously received chronic PE/PI (≥1 every 2 wks and <3 per wk for ≥8 wks prior to ECU). Clinical data, including pt-reported outcomes, were collected at baseline and through the 26-wk treatment and ongoing extension studies up to data cut-off (mean [SD] duration of ECU treatment: C08-002=58 [29] wks and C08-003=60 [12] wks). HRQoL was measured with the EQ-5D self-reporting questionnaire and a 20-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) validated for a number of disease populations. EQ-5D has 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) and 3 levels (no problem, some problems and extreme problems). Change in HRQoL was calculated using the US time trade-off (TTO) index and VAS valuation techniques, and ANOVA analysis. A change of >0.06 is considered a clinically meaningful change Results C08-002: 15/17 pts received ECU until Wk 26 (2 discontinued at Wks 1 and 6; protocol violation and an adverse event unrelated to ECU, respectively) and 13 continued into the extension study. Median age=28 yrs and 29% were on dialysis immediately prior to ECU. Median time from diagnosis to screening =10 mo. All patients had eGFR ≤60 mL/min/1.73m2. C08-003: 20 pts received ECU for 26 wks and 19 continued into the extension study. Median age=28 yrs. Median time from diagnosis to screening=48 mo. Median duration of eGFR ≤60 mL/min/1.73m2=180 days at baseline. HRQoL: In both cohorts of distinct trial pts, ECU substantially improved HRQoL through Wk 26, and sustained this thereafter during long-term ECU therapy (table). In trial C08-002, improvements were seen as early as Day 7 (0.12, p=0.0346). Point estimate improvement (95%CI) in HRQoL from baseline to1 yr was 0.32 (0.27-0.36) for C08-002 and 0.09 (0.05-0.14) for C08-003. On an individual pt basis, 87% and 73% of C08-002 and C08-003 pts, respectively, achieved a clinically meaningful change that represented a clinically important large or moderate improvement in HRQoL measures, respectively. Conclusions aHUS pts have an impaired HRQoL both from a direct impact of aHUS morbidity and management requirements (such as PE/PI), but also from the systemic nature of the disease. In patients with aHUS, significant improvements in HRQoL were achieved rapidly with ECU (as early as Day 7). Sustained long-term treatment with ECU maintained the improvements in HRQoL. Disclosures: Muus: Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: The research described is a clinical trial of eculizumab in patients with aHUS, an indication in which its use is not approved. Licht:Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goodship:Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding. Greenbaum:Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bedrosian:Alexion: Employment. Loirat:Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding. Legendre:Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207