The Strategic Plan for Preservation and Promotion on the Southern Folk Art in the Area of Songkhal Lake Basin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to study the properties, the purpose and the significance of folklore arts. Also, aims to study the conception of the folklore artists for preservation and promotion of folklore performances. This research applied the application of ethnographic study for collecting field data and organizes academic conferences. Academic conferences gather the notions of personals from different authorities to form a strategic plan. Participants of which, are the local citizens that locate on the basin of Songklha lake. The primary survey has found that, there were variety performances of folk. However, the researchers will study for 4 categories includings: Shadow play (Nang Talung), Manora Performance, Thai folk music, and LikayHulu. Each genre showcases fine attributes and unique purpose of Its own. The arts express the dwelling of locals, politics, top ographical terrain and etc. Furthermore, the artists suggest the objectives of preservation and promotion of folklore performances. The expectancy of this research is to inherit the inestimable arts of folklore performance to the future generation. The hosting of the academic conference, for strategic planning, is through the contribution of folklore artists and personals from different organizations. Elementary schools, high schools, the secondary education service area office, universities, children and juvenile training center office 9, Songklha’s cultural office, Songklha Rajabhat University’s cultural office, Nang Talung and Manoraperformance training center, Songklha Province administrative organization and students all get in the act of brainstorming, analyzing and criticizing. The aftermaths of the conference are to form a strategic plan on promotion and preservation of folklore arts across the Songklha lake basin areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".