Dietary ‘G-Pro’ Supplementation Effects on Growth, Carcass Composition and Digestive Enzymes in Common Carp, Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of a commercial feed additive ‘G-Pro’ was evaluated on growth, body composition and digestive enzyme activity of common carp, Cyprinus carpio . Fry of average weight 0.8±0.03 g stocked in 25 m 3 outdoor cement tanks were fed daily on five isonitrogenous and isocaloric diets containing 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 g G-Pro/kg diet respectively in triplicate for 140 days at 5% body weight in two equal meals. Fish fed on the feed additive incorporated diets showed improved growth performance, feed utilization and body composition compared to those fed the control diet. Growth, survival, food conversion, VSI, RNA: DNA ratio, carcass protein and fat were the best in fish fed 2 g G-Pro/kg diet. The water quality parameters monitored were within acceptable limits for carp culture. Results of this trial indicate that G-Pro exerts positive effect on the performance of common carp.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".