Bibliographic record
Abstract
This Doctor of Ministry thesis looks at the ministry of evangelism. Specifically, it looks at the practice of this ministry in three Anglican suburban churches in southwestern Ontario – the churches of Trinity, Aurora, Trinity, Streetsville and the writer’s parish of St. Simon’s in Oakville – for the purpose of creating an evangelism plan for St. Simon’s that is theologically sound and uses the tool of marketing. The history of Anglicanism and its impact on the present-day practice of the ministry of evangelism are examined to provide theoretical background. In addition, great attention is paid to the theologian David Bosch. His definition of evangelism is at the core of this thesis. Additionally, his explanation of paradigm shift is foundational to understanding the church’s move from the Enlightenment paradigm to the emerging ecumenical paradigm. Key, too, is the distinction he makes between dimensional and intentional evangelism, and the importance he places on creating points of connection helps to form the direction of this thesis. Furthermore, an understanding of the present-day religious landscape and demographics are discussed along with a reflection on how marketing can be used to strengthen the ministry of evangelism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.078 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".