MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566511333

Citizenship and Agency under Neoliberal Global Consumerism: A Search for Informed Democratic Practices/Response to Buschman

2016· article· en· W2566511333 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Information Ethics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPatient Dignity and Privacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsAgency (philosophy)CitizenshipDemocracySociologyContext (archaeology)Public relationsPossession (linguistics)Political scienceGlobalizationPublic administrationLawSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThis article situates the ethics of information professionals within its contemporary public and political settings. An information ethics so contextualized can help promote the kinds of democratic and citizenships that are the basis of this special issue of the Journal of Information Ethics. While this paper cannot fully canvas the raised, it can take us some way in balancing our perspective on the political packed inside the goals of an informed, citizenry. It proposes a coherent network of concepts about the political context of the contemporary by mapping its challenges. The article reviews the political and public content of the concepts of and globalization, citizen and citizenship, and discusses the implied agency of the informed citizen. It concludes with a discussion that draws out some of the broad responses to these contexts.The call for papers for the Information Ethics Roundtable 20i4 conference describes citizenship as the possession of knowledges, skills and attitudes that make it possible ... to be actively involved in local, national and institutions and systems that directly or indirectly affect their lives (University of Alberta, 20i4). Within this statement lie a number of political concepts that call for investigation. For instance, as Murdock and Golding note, citizenship is no longer simply about participation in the political process, but includes debate and that contributes to conditions that allow people to become full members of the society at every level (i989, p. i82). Agency is thus implied, pointing to ideas about informed ethical responsibility and the act of democratic citizenship. The statement is thus deeply entangled with information ethics. Since the scholarly enterprise of information ethics intersects with democratic politics, it is productive to unpack the meaning of these key concepts and their political context. This will not be an exercise in political philosophy (pondering the definition and relationship between concepts like order and power) but an examination in the practical vein of democratic theory where issues are addressed because of their public importance [in an] attempt to compose a coherent network of concepts in order to analyze what is going on in the contemporary world (Wolin, 2004, p. 504). These concepts are always articulated within pragmatic and contentious political contexts (Mara, 2008, p. 2i). This article is thus an exercise in proposing a coherent network of concepts about the political context of the contemporary in order to foster a potential form of informed agency in a context. This will be accomplished by mapping its challenges through constructing a rough pragmatic resemblance to immediate reality that any analysis must have if it is to be translated into successful political strategy or (Hofstadter, i948, p. ii4). In this spirit, this article reviews the political content of the concepts of and globalization, citizen and citizenship, and lastly the implied agency of the informed citizen. The conclusion will seek to draw out some of the broader challenges and responses to these contexts.On Global and GlobalizationA great deal nests inside these concepts. First, global has come to be both highly significant and meaningless. The concept is decidedly hollow[:] Although the impinges on our local lives, we lack the ability to orient ourselves within it as a space of action (Miller, 20i3, p. 429). This is because the planet-encompassing and deeply compelling of trade and finance, the environment, media and communication, and terror and violence, are primarily linked by globally united financial markets (Brosio, 20i3, p. 276). Appadurai (i998) characterizes globalization's basic ideas:The word globalization ... marks a set of transitions ... since the i970s, in which multinational forms of capitalist organization began to be replaced by transnational, flexible, and irregular forms of organization, as labour, finance, technology, and technological capital began to be assembled in ways that treated national boundaries as mere constraints or fictions [p. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.587
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it