MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2566511333

Citizenship and Agency under Neoliberal Global Consumerism: A Search for Informed Democratic Practices/Response to Buschman

2016· article· en· W2566511333 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Information Ethics · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePatient Dignity and Privacy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsAgency (philosophy)CitizenshipDemocracySociologyContext (archaeology)Public relationsPossession (linguistics)Political scienceGlobalizationPublic administrationLawSocial science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

AbstractThis article situates the ethics of information professionals within its contemporary public and political settings. An information ethics so contextualized can help promote the kinds of democratic and citizenships that are the basis of this special issue of the Journal of Information Ethics. While this paper cannot fully canvas the raised, it can take us some way in balancing our perspective on the political packed inside the goals of an informed, citizenry. It proposes a coherent network of concepts about the political context of the contemporary by mapping its challenges. The article reviews the political and public content of the concepts of and globalization, citizen and citizenship, and discusses the implied agency of the informed citizen. It concludes with a discussion that draws out some of the broad responses to these contexts.The call for papers for the Information Ethics Roundtable 20i4 conference describes citizenship as the possession of knowledges, skills and attitudes that make it possible ... to be actively involved in local, national and institutions and systems that directly or indirectly affect their lives (University of Alberta, 20i4). Within this statement lie a number of political concepts that call for investigation. For instance, as Murdock and Golding note, citizenship is no longer simply about participation in the political process, but includes debate and that contributes to conditions that allow people to become full members of the society at every level (i989, p. i82). Agency is thus implied, pointing to ideas about informed ethical responsibility and the act of democratic citizenship. The statement is thus deeply entangled with information ethics. Since the scholarly enterprise of information ethics intersects with democratic politics, it is productive to unpack the meaning of these key concepts and their political context. This will not be an exercise in political philosophy (pondering the definition and relationship between concepts like order and power) but an examination in the practical vein of democratic theory where issues are addressed because of their public importance [in an] attempt to compose a coherent network of concepts in order to analyze what is going on in the contemporary world (Wolin, 2004, p. 504). These concepts are always articulated within pragmatic and contentious political contexts (Mara, 2008, p. 2i). This article is thus an exercise in proposing a coherent network of concepts about the political context of the contemporary in order to foster a potential form of informed agency in a context. This will be accomplished by mapping its challenges through constructing a rough pragmatic resemblance to immediate reality that any analysis must have if it is to be translated into successful political strategy or (Hofstadter, i948, p. ii4). In this spirit, this article reviews the political content of the concepts of and globalization, citizen and citizenship, and lastly the implied agency of the informed citizen. The conclusion will seek to draw out some of the broader challenges and responses to these contexts.On Global and GlobalizationA great deal nests inside these concepts. First, global has come to be both highly significant and meaningless. The concept is decidedly hollow[:] Although the impinges on our local lives, we lack the ability to orient ourselves within it as a space of action (Miller, 20i3, p. 429). This is because the planet-encompassing and deeply compelling of trade and finance, the environment, media and communication, and terror and violence, are primarily linked by globally united financial markets (Brosio, 20i3, p. 276). Appadurai (i998) characterizes globalization's basic ideas:The word globalization ... marks a set of transitions ... since the i970s, in which multinational forms of capitalist organization began to be replaced by transnational, flexible, and irregular forms of organization, as labour, finance, technology, and technological capital began to be assembled in ways that treated national boundaries as mere constraints or fictions [p. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,587
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,994

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,014
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,158
Tête enseignante GPT0,423
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle