MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566694224 · doi:10.1182/blood.v118.21.939.939

Multidimensional Flow Cytometry Significantly Improves Upon the Morphologic Assessment of Post-Induction Marrow Remission Status – Comparison of Morphology and Multidimensional Flow Cytometry; A Report From the Children's Oncology Group AML Protocol AAML0531

2011· article· en· W2566694224 on OpenAlexaff
Michael R. Loken, Todd A. Alonzo, Laura Pardo, Robert B. Gerbing, Richard Aplenc, Lillian Sung, Susana C. Raimondi, Betsy Hirsch, Samir B. Kahwash, Amy Heerema‐McKenney, Laura Winter, Kathleen Glick, Patti Byron, Laura Fransisco, Tanya Wallas, Stella M. Davies, Franklin O. Smith, Alan S. Gamis, Soheil Meshinchi

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduction chemotherapyMedicineInternal medicineChemotherapyOncologyBone marrowTransplantationFlow cytometryGastroenterologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 939 Initial response to induction chemotherapy is a significant predictor of outcome in leukemias, where those with rapid response have an improved outcome compared to the non-responders. Morphologic evaluation of post induction marrow has been the gold standard in assessing remission status in leukemias, where those with <5% blasts are considered to be in complete remission (CR), whereas those with '5% blast are considered induction failures. MRC AML 10 study, using morphologic assessment of remission, delineated a clinically significant threshold of 15% marrow blasts after induction I, where those with 5–15% blasts were shown to have a similar outcome to those in morphologic CR, while those with >15% blasts were considered to be high risk. The Children's Oncology Group (COG) phase III AML protocol AAML0531 which treated 1022 eligible patients without Down Syndrome (DS) on an MRC based chemotherapy backbone, utilized the >15% post induction morphologic blast threshold, as assessed at the institutional level, to allocate patients to specific risk groups based on the observed post induction 1 blast prevalence. In this study, all patients regardless of initial response would receive a second course of similar induction chemotherapy. Those with 5–15% blasts after course 1 with no other risk features who achieved a CR after the second course were considered intermediate risk, but those with >15% post course 1 blasts who achieved a CR after course 2 were considered high risk and allocated to stem cell transplantation from the most suitable donor in first CR. As part of this trial, multidimensional flow cytometry (MDF) was used to assess marrow response after each course of induction chemotherapy. As morphologic evaluation would not be able to distinguish normal and malignant blasts in the marrow, we inquired whether morphologic CR status correlates with MDF findings. Of the 1022 eligible non-DS patients treated on AAML0531, 784 patients had consented to the correlative biology studies and had available MDF data for correlation with morphology. Of the 784 patients, 185 patients (24%) had failed to achieve a morphologic CR (>5% blast by morphology) after the initial course of chemotherapy, of which 94 were partial remissions (PR, 5–15% blast) and 91 were persistent disease (PD, >15%). Of these 185 patients who failed to achieve a morphologic CR, 67 patients (36%) had no evidence of disease by MDF, and the remaining 64% had MDF detectable disease. Clinical outcome evaluation of these patients who failed induction (>5% blast) at the end of course 1 based on MDF status demonstrated that disease free survival for those with MDF detectable disease was 24% compared to that of 52% in those with induction failure with no MDF detectable disease (p<0.0001). Corresponding Overall survival was 48% and 76%, respectively (p=0.005). As 15% blast threshold at the end of induction 1 was used as a threshold for risk allocation, we specifically evaluated the prevalence and clinical implications of MDF-detectable disease in this cohort of high risk patients. Of the 91 patients with >15% blast after course I, 25 (27%) had no evidence of disease by MDF. Disease-free survival at 3 years from end of induction in this high risk cohort with and without MDF-detectable disease was 20% and 55%, respectively (p<0.0001) with a corresponding OS of 47% and 83% (p=0.014). This study highlights the fact that morphologic evaluation of marrow specimens may not be adequate for post induction disease assessment. Multi-dimensional flow cytometry provides significant information for accurate assessment of response. Disclosures: Smith: Seattle Genetics:; Eisai:; Archimedes Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207