Étude de la validité concourante de l’outil orientant québécois VIP à l’aide du questionnaire d’investigation des intérêts professionnels Hexa 3D
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Élaboré par des conseillères pédagogiques québécoises, l’outil VIP définit le type de personnalité dominant d’adolescents à partir de la typologie de Holland, tout en visant à susciter et à développer leur implication dans le processus d’orientation. La présente recherche teste la validité concourante de cet outil, en comparaison avec le questionnaire Hexa 3D, sur un échantillon d’élèves français de seconde générale et technologique. Les résultats montrent que des aménagements doivent être effectués afin d’améliorer les qualités psychométriques de l’outil VIP, mais que sa forme ludique stimule les élèves, ce qui permet de le considérer comme une première activité possible pour impliquer des élèves dans un processus d’orientation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".