MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566776106 · doi:10.12802/relime.13.1741a

ESPACIOS DE TRABAJO MATEMÁTICO. PUNTOS DE VISTA Y PERSPECTIVAS

2016· article· es· W2566776106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation in Rural Contexts
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este número especial de la Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa (RELIME) es el resultado de distintos artículos elaborados para el tercer simposio Espacio de Trabajo Matemático (ETM), cuyo objeto de estudio es el desarrollo y los usos posibles de la noción de ETM en la didáctica de las matemáticas. El trabajo matemático y su funcionamiento en el marco escolar están a la base del enfoque de los ETM. En esta introducción se sintetiza el enfoque teórico, no como algo prescriptivo sino como una propuesta sugerente para enriquecer el estudio didáctico del trabajo matemático del alumnado y profesorado. Seguidamente, se describe la organización temática de las contribuciones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it