MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566785614

Анализ лесных кварталов по численности пожаров и расстоянию от места дислокации пожарной службы

2015· article· ru· W2566785614 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Воронежского института ГПС МЧС России · 2015
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAerospace, Electronics, Mathematical Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)GeographyForestryEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a set of points of monitoring of the centers of ignition take forest quarter, for the long-term period subject at least to one forest fire. Struck with fires forest quarter take for objects of the analysis, and for additional object take fire service of a forestry. Measure distances from fire service to the conditional centers of the forest quarters struck with fires, and from the account book for the long-term period define number of the forest fires which have happened on the same forest quarter struck with fires. Trends and wave regularities of influence of this distance on number of forest fires on one struck forest quarter are given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.058

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it