MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566797988 · doi:10.22498/pages.24.1.30

New Forest Dynamics working group

2016· article· en· W2566797988 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Claer, Richard C. Chiverrell, RJ DeRose, Ю. И. Дробышев, J Morris, Miroslav Svoboda

Bibliographic record

VenuePast Global Change Magazine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicForest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroup (periodic table)Group dynamicDynamics (music)ForestryGeographyPsychologyChemistrySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forest dynamics are driven by an array of disturbances both natural (e.g. fire, windstorms, pathogens) and anthropogenic (e.g. clear cutting, selective logging, slash-andburn) in origin. Evidence of these events is recorded in sediments (lakes and mires; Fig. Natural disturbances are fundamental for vital functioning of forest ecosystems, and their impacts (e.g. frequency, severity, spatial pattern) change in response to increasing climatic and anthropogenic pressures. Understanding the disturbance dynamics of the past, present and future is critical research to better inform forest conservation and management (Morris et al. 2015).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePast Global Change MagazineSame topicForest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in ChinaFrench-language works237,207