MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566822290 · doi:10.4000/terrain.15997

Conversions inuit

2016· article· fr· W2566822290 on OpenAlexaffabout
Frédéric Laugrand

Bibliographic record

VenueTerrain · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’auteur interroge la notion de « transformation spirituelle » telle qu’elle est mobilisée aujourd’hui en milieu inuit par des groupes évangéliques comme le Canada Awakening Ministries (CAM). Bien implanté chez les Inuit du Nunavik et du Nunavut, ce dernier a noué d’étroites relations avec des pasteurs en provenance des îles Fidji. Ses adeptes organisent de nombreux exorcismes et des rituels de guérison de la terre. L’auteur émet l’hypothèse selon laquelle les Inuit en reconnaissent l’idiome tout en disposant de traditions certes fort différentes mais confrontées de nos jours à de multiples défis : d’un côté, l’aiguillon écologique et de l’autre, l’exploitation des ressources nordiques et le discours du réchauffement climatique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTerrainSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207