MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566829716 · doi:10.1097/paf.0000000000000284

Streptococcus Pneumoniae Detection Long Time After Death in a Fatal Case of Waterhouse-Friderichsen Syndrome

2016· article· en· W2566829716 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Verzeletti, Carlo Bonfanti, Anna Leide, Elena Azzalini, Maria Antonia De Francesco, Giorgio Piccinelli, Francesco Ferrari

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutopsyStreptococcus pneumoniaeMedicineCause of deathPathologyMicrobiologyBiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a fatal case of Waterhouse-Friderichsen syndrome in a 64-year-old man. The diagnosis, suspected during the autopsy (performed 63 hours after death), was confirmed through the successful detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae DNA and antigens in samples (blood and liver) collected during the autopsy. These results conformed with blood cultures performed antemortem, which became available only the day after the autopsy. The case underlines the need to collect biological material (liver and blood samples) during autopsy for microbiological investigations, although the collection is performed a long time after the death, suggesting that a liver sample works for DNA and liver and blood work for Streptococcus pneumoniae antigen detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Forensic Medicine & PathologySame topicPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsFrench-language works237,207