MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Formation and evolution of melt holes on vine-shoots during the winter in Quebec

2002· article· en· W2567099622 on OpenAlexaffabout
G. Bertrand Carrière, Y Jolivet, Jean‐Marie Dubois

Bibliographic record

VenueOENO One · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHorticultural and Viticultural Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowFrost (temperature)VineShootSublimation (psychology)Environmental scienceSnow coverGeologyPhysical geographyAtmospheric sciencesHorticultureGeographyGeomorphologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vine cultivation in Quebec is confronted with the problem of an unfavorable climate specially because of winter frost. Over the last few years, artificial snow has been used, at the experimental level, as one of the protective methods implemented during winter at the Sous les Channilles vineyard, in southern Quebec. However, towards the end of January, the increase in solar radiation intensity is instrumental in causing the fonnation of inelt holes along the vine shoots thus reducing the protective effect of the snow cover. According to varying climatic conditions, we show that there are many factors at the origin of the formation and the metamorphoses of melt holes. These melt holes can be fonned by sublimation or fusion of the snow and can sometimes present mixed fonns. Through their presence, they modify the vertical temperature gradients in the snow cover and play a primary rôle in the evolution of snow metamorphoses near the stocks. The formation of melt holes near the vine shoots can also damage the fruit buds submitted to cold temperatures prevailing on the surface. The empty space created near the stocks can permit the infiltration of cold air and, in situations of extreme cold, damages can be sustained by the fruit buds. On the other hand, our observations also show that, when melt holes are covered by snow, a constructive metamorphosis is initiated and the melt holes can fill themselves up through the evolution of internal frost. If the melt holes are not too large, the formation of frost can obstruct the surface orifice and restrict the infiltration of cold air from the exterior within the snow cover. Furthermore, the widening of melt holes early in the spring can cause the premature disappearance of the snow cover in the vine rows and, accordingly, can expose the buds to congelifraction temperatures below the cryotolerance threshold. Artificial snow is more efficient than natural snow in the sense that, since its volumetric mass is normally superior to that of natural snow, the development of melt holes is a lot slower. Accordingly, artificial snow provides more durable protection in the spring. The study of the pro¬ cesses controlling the formation and the evolution of melt holes has also shown the large variability of the snow cover according to local meteorological conditions. Finally, the understanding of the processes at the base of the formation of melt holes sheds new light on the rôle of snow in agriculture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOENO OneSame topicHorticultural and Viticultural ResearchFrench-language works237,207