MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2567104575 · doi:10.1515/jssi-2014-0047

A Dynamic Model of Housing Wealth Effect: Based on the Diversity of Wealth Expectations

2014· article· en· W2567104575 on OpenAlexaff
Danxiao Jiao, Di Wu, Xiuting Li, Jichang Dong, Desheng Wu

Bibliographic record

Venue系统科学与信息学报(英文) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFallacyDiversity (politics)EconomicsConsumption (sociology)InequalityFunction (biology)Wealth effectMicroeconomicsSociologyMathematicsSocial scienceMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Considering the dynamics and diversity of wealth expectations, this paper follows and extends Hall’s consumption function to establish a new dynamic model of housing wealth effect. People are classified into the rich group and the poor group and a housing wealth effect model is made for each group to explore the relationship between housing wealth effect and social inequality. We get three interesting conclusions which are helpful for further empirical test apart from the former deviation or fallacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue系统科学与信息学报(英文)Same topicHousing Market and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207