High-order-harmonic generation in molecular sequential double ionization by intense circularly polarized laser pulses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present effects of electron energy transfer by electron collisions on high-order-harmonic generation (HHG) in molecular sequential double ionization by intense circularly polarized laser pulses. Results from numerical solutions of time-dependent Schr\"odinger equations for extended (large internuclear distance) ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}$ where electrons are entangled and hence delocalized by exchange show that HHG with cutoff energy up to ${I}_{p}+24{U}_{p}$ can be obtained, where ${I}_{p}$ is the molecule ionization potential and ${U}_{p}={I}_{0}/4{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}^{2}$ (in atomic units) is the ponderomotive energy for pulse intensity ${I}_{0}$ and frequency ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0}$. A time-frequency analysis is employed to identify electron collisions for the generation of harmonics. Extended HHG arises from electron energy exchange, which agrees well with the prediction of a classical two electron collision model. Results for nonsymmetric ${\mathrm{HHe}}^{+}$ where initially electrons are localized on He are also compared and confirm the role of initial electron delocalization via entanglement for obtaining extended HHG plateaus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".