MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2567161965 · doi:10.22256/pubvet.v7n19.1601

Importância da escolha de receptoras em um programa de transferência de embriões em bovinos

2015· article· pt· W2567161965 on OpenAlexaff
Marília Torres Honorato, Rafael A. Ferro, Diogo Alves da Costa Ferro, Klayto José Gonçalves dos Santos, Miliane Alves da Costa, Joaquim Luiz Rodrigues Filho

Bibliographic record

VenuePubVet · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsArtificial Insemination Center of Quebec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The usage of reproductive biotechnologies is even more representing the evolution of bovine production in Brazil and around the world. The artificial insemination in cattle came as the pioneer of this evolution, followed by conventional Embryos Transference (ET) that brought the Follicular Aspiration guided by the ultrasonography for the production of bovine embryos in vitro, making the enhancement of the cattle genetics possible, in quantity and quality. Describing the aspects related to embryos transference program was the aiming goal, reporting that the receptors responsible for the gestation of genetic superior bovine are in a position of prominence. The Follicular Aspiration program came as the evolution of the conventional ET, making the processes more practical, viable and efficient, but it should not

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubVetSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207