MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Fully Algebraic Model for Multichannel Low Energy Nucleon-Nucleus Scattering

2002· article· en· W2567252012 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Science and Technology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaWinnipeg Institute for Theoretical Physics
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsScatteringPhysicsAlgebraic numberResonance (particle physics)NucleusBound stateNeutron scatteringNucleonCoupling (piping)Matrix (chemical analysis)Atomic physicsQuantum mechanicsChemistryMathematicsMathematical analysisMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compound resonances in nucleus-nucleus scattering (bound states in the continuum) relate to bound states in the subsystems. Both types of resonances can be studied in a unified and general framework by a model for the scattering that uses Sturmian expansions of multichannel interactions between the colliding nuclei. Associated with such expanded multichannel interactions are algebraic multichannel scattering matrices. As an example, we have used the collective model (to second order) to define the interaction potentials for low energy neutron- 12C scattering allowing coupling between the ground 0+1, 2+1 (4.44 MeV), and 0+2 (7.64 MeV) states. The algebraic S matrix for this system then has been evaluated and cross sections as a function of energy obtained Resonance structures occur naturally and are reflected in the actual measured data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it