UAV, come to me: End-to-end, multi-scale situated HRI with an uninstrumented human and a distant UAV
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the first demonstration of end-to-end far-to-near situated interaction between an uninstrumented human user and an initially distant outdoor autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). The user uses an arm-waving gesture as a signal to attract the UAV's attention from a distance. Once this signal is detected, the UAV approaches the user using appearance-based tracking until it is close enough to detect the human's face. Once in this close-range interaction setting, the user is able to use hand gestures to communicate its commands to the UAV. Throughout the interaction, the UAV uses colored-light-based feedback to communicate its intent to the user. We developed this system to work reliably with a low-cost consumer UAV, with only computation off-board. We describe each component of this interaction system, giving details of the depth estimation strategy and the cascade predictive flight controller for approaching the user. We also present experimental results on the performance of the complete system and its individual components.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it