MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2567379716 · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-54305-9_15

Visually Embodying Psychosis: The Ethics of Performing Difficult Experiences

2016· book-chapter· en· W2567379716 on OpenAlexaff
Katherine Boydell, Carmela Solimine, Siona Jackson

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceReflexivityPsychologyVocabularyAestheticsSocial psychologySociologyVisual artsArtSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artistic modes of research representation may enhance the likelihood of impact (negative or positive) on audiences and, consequently, on artists and researchers. Dance provides a visual vocabulary wherein subjective experiences of mental health are shared and research results disseminated. We focus on a key ethical issue with using dance performers as co-researchers—the concept of “dangerous emotional terrain” which describes potentially negative impacts of the embodiment of research depicting difficult lived experiences. Two central strategies to address negative emotional impact are identified: reflexive practice and creation of a safe and supportive environment via collaborative partnerships with research team and performers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicDiversity and Impact of DanceFrench-language works237,207