MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Autoantibodies in Patients with ITP Do Not Bind to Patient-Specific Epitopes on Platelet Glycoproteins.

2008· article· en· W2567438736 on OpenAlexaff
James W. Smith, Derek Coull, Jane C. Moore, Ishac Nazi, Donald M. Arnold, John G. Kelton

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoantibodyPlateletImmunologyPlatelet membrane glycoproteinEpitopeAntigenAntibodyThrombocytopenic purpuraGlycoproteinMedicineImmune thrombocytopeniaImmune systemMolecular biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) remains primarily a diagnosis of exclusion. Evidence indicates that the thrombocytopenia is caused by a shortened platelet lifespan mediated by autoantibodies directed to platelet surface glycoproteins. Methods to detect the autoantibodies vary in their sensitivity and specificity. Earlier tests that measure only the amount of immunoglobulin associated with the platelet were unable to differentiate immune from non-immune thrombocytopenia. Tests that measure glycoprotein-specific autoantibodies directly on the patient platelets are more useful. Measurements of platelet-associated autoantibodies to GPIIbIIIa and GPIbIX using monoclonal-based assays (antigen capture assay) demonstrate a high specificity (>90%) and moderate sensitivity (60%). However, detection of circulating plasma autoantibodies in patients with ITP is relatively insensitive. One proposal is that the autoantibodies bind to restricted conformational epitopes found on patient, but not normal target platelets. To investigate this, we studied samples from patients sent to the McMaster Blood Disorders Clinic for investigation of thrombocytopenia. We identified 22 patients who were consistently positive for autoantibodies in the direct platelet antigen capture assay and used these to study the binding of plasma anti-platelet autoantibodies in the indirect platelet antigen capture assay. Direct testing of the patient platelets demonstrated IgG autoantibodies to GPIIbIIIa (OD 0.34 to 3.21, mean 1.52) and to GP Ib/IX (OD 0.29 to 1.99, mean 0.72). Plasma/serum from the same sample dates was used for indirect testing. Normal target platelets were incubated with 0.5 mL of patient plasma and then tested for bound IgG antibodies to specific glycoproteins. Of 22 patient samples tested, the majority (15/22) were negative in the indirect assay. Only 7 (32%) demonstrated weak binding of plasma antibodies to normal platelets. IgG antibodies to GPIIbIIIa (OD 0.25 to 0.52, mean 0.31) were detected in all 7, and antibodies to GP IbIX (OD 0.31) in one patient sample. These 7 patients had demonstrated high level of autoantibodies on their platelets in the direct assay (OD 0.50 to 3.21, mean 1.90). We then investigated whether the platelet-bound autoantibodies measured in the direct assay using the patient platelets, would recognize epitopes on normal target platelets. We eluted the IgG from the platelets of 9 patients (pH 2.8 citrate buffer) who were positive in the direct antigen capture assay. The eluates were incubated with normal platelets, which were then tested for GPIIbIIIa and GPIbIX specific antibodies. Of the 9 samples, 7 demonstrated efficient rebinding of the IgG to normal target platelets (pre-eluted samples: OD 0.41 to 2.79, mean 1.97; eluted/rebound samples: OD 0.42 to 2.87, mean 1.90). The 2 samples that did not rebind to normal targets had weak binding in the standard direct assay (OD 0.34 and 0.51). These studies investigated and compared plasma and platelet-bound autoantibodies in ITP patients who had high levels of IgG antibodies to GPIIbIIIa or GPIbIX on their platelets. We found that the majority of these patients do not have detectable autoantibody in their plasma, and that only low levels of plasma anti-platelet antibody are detectable in those patients with the highest levels of platelet-bound autoantibodies. The platelet-bound autoantibodies can be eluted from patient platelets and rebound to normal target platelets. These studies indicate that antiplatelet autoantibodies in patients with ITP recognize epitopes expressed on both patient and normal target platelets, and suggest that patient-dependent conformational antigens do not account for the low levels of circulating autoantibody detected in patient plasma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207