MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2567456242 · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/49/5/052005

A look at Francis runner blades response during transients

2016· article· en· W2567456242 on OpenAlexaffabout
M Gagnon, J Nicolle, Mark J. F. Lawrence

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWarrantControl (management)Reliability engineeringPower (physics)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceBusinessPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data shows that the mechanical response of Francis runner blades is sensitive to power plant control systems. To demonstrate this, we have explored two such systems: wicket gates opening and air admission. The proper control of these systems does more than warrant safe operation; they can also be used to minimize the strain cycle amplitudes during transients such as: startups, shutdowns and load rejections. Proper control parameters settings should minimize the equipment risk of fatigue failure without negative side effects on other components and objectives. With the help of measured examples from Hydro-Québec power plants, this paper demonstrates that a better understanding of these systems is needed in order to move beyond costly trial and error fine-tuning methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207