MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2567458317 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2016.2641478

Improved PV Inverter Operating Range Using a Miniboost

2016· article· en· W2567458317 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemSolar micro-inverterVoltageMaximum power point trackingInverterEngineeringMaximum power principleElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Electrical engineeringComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the past two decades, the operating voltage of photovoltaic (PV) installation has increased in order to reduce current ratings and system installation costs. Such a large number of PV panels in series (e.g., 1000-1500 V systems) lead to wide variations of PV voltage due undesirable effects such as shading, soiling/dust, aging, and hot surface temperature. A partial shade would normally shut down solar inverters, unless a boost stage is added to the system input to ensure a proper dc-link operating voltage for the inverter. A boost input stage can double the input voltage operating range to extract maximum power under any possible shading and temperature condition. In this paper, a new PV string boost topology arrangement is proposed in the form of a miniboost used for three-phase grid-connected converters. The string miniboost increases the dc voltage range to extend power extraction under shading and low irradiance conditions and only requires to process a fraction of the rated power. The proposed cost-effective solution is further improved by using the inverter peak power envelope at boundary operation, resulting in expanded energy extraction beyond existing techniques. A design procedure to optimally size the miniboost and the peak-power envelope is presented along with a comparative analysis, under different irradiance levels, to illustrate the advantages in energy extraction obtained with the proposed PV string miniboost solution under low voltage and boundary operation. Furthermore, improved efficiency operation schemes and issues of common-mode current are discussed, and three mitigation design techniques intended for three-phase, three-level inverter transformerless topology are presented. Simulations and experimental results using a dual miniboost dc-dc stage and three-phase three-level neutral point clamped inverter are presented to validate the proposed dc-bus extension range and system design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it