A low-dissipation monotonicity-preserving scheme for turbulent flows in hydraulic turbines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this work is to improve the inherent dissipation of the numerical schemes under the framework of a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation. The governing equations are solved by the finite volume method with the k-ω SST turbulence model. Instead of the van Albada limiter, a novel eddy-preserving limiter is employed in the MUSCL reconstructions to minimize the dissipation of the vortex. The eddy-preserving procedure inactivates the van Albada limiter in the swirl plane and reduces the artificial dissipation to better preserve vortical flow structures. Steady and unsteady simulations of turbulent flows in a straight channel and a straight asymmetric diffuser are demonstrated. Profiles of velocity, Reynolds shear stress and turbulent kinetic energy are presented and compared against large eddy simulation (LES) and/or experimental data. Finally, comparisons are made to demonstrate the capability of the eddy-preserving limiter scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".