[ES] EL MOTÍN DE 1692 REVISADO: ¿UN GOLPE DE ESTADO CONTRA EL VIRREY CONDE DE GALVE? // THE 1692 RIOT REVISITED: A COUP AGAINST THE VICEROY COUNT OF GALVE?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desde su toma de posesión el virrey conde de Galve (1688-1696) implementó una serie de medidas que ayudarían a la regeneración moral de la sociedad. Sin embargo, las medidas adoptadas contra el pulque, los baños temascales, el baratillo y la ineficacia de la lucha contra el bandolerismo generaron un grave malestar en las clases populares y en una parte de la élite mexicana. El catalizador del descontento social fueron las malas cosechas de trigo y maíz y la consiguiente escasez y alza de precios a causa de las inclemencias meteorológicas habidas en el reino desde mediados de 1691. La consecuencia final fue el violento motín que estalló en la capital la tarde del 8 de junio de 1692. El virrey no fue depuesto, como seguramente buscaban los que se escondían detrás de los indígenas, verdaderos cabezas de turcos de la rebelión, ni fue cesado, probablemente por los fuertes apoyos que tenía en la corte, pero sí censuradas algunas de sus medidas. PALABRAS CLAVE: Nueva España, motín, descontento social, acaparamiento de granos, alza de precios, revuelta indígena, Sigüenza y Góngora, Chacón Abarca. --Ever since taking up position as viceroy, the Count of Galve (1688-1696) enacted a series of measures aimed at the moral regeneration of the Mexican society. However, many such measures seriously upset the popular classes and even some members of the Mexican elite. The origin of the people’s discontent was the poor wheat and corn harvests resulting from the inclement weather in the kingdom since mid-1691. The situation led to the vicious riot that broke out in the capital on the afternoon of 8 June 8 1692. Although the viceroy was not deposed, some of his measures were censored. KEY WORDS: New Spain, riot, social discontent, grain hoarding, price rise, indigenous turmoil, Sigüenza y Góngora, Chacón Abarca.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".