Efficient Terrain Driven Coral Coverage Using Gaussian Processes for Mosaic Synthesis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we present an efficient method for visual mapping of open water environments using exploration and reward identification followed by selective visual coverage. In particular, we consider the problem of visual mapping a shallow water coral reef to provide an environmental assay. Our approach has two stages based on two classes of sensors: bathymetric mapping and visual mapping. We use a robotic boat to collect bathymetric data using a sonar sensor for the first stage and video data using a visual sensor for the second stage. Since underwater environments have varying visibility, we use the sonar map to select regions of potential value, and efficiently construct the bathymetric map from sparse data using a Gaussian Process model. In the second stage, we collect visual data only where there is good potential pay-off, and we use a reward-driven finite-horizon model akin to a Markov Decision Process to extract the maximum amount of valuable data in the least amount of time. We show that a very small number of sonar readings suffice on a typical fringing reef. We validate and demonstrate our surveying technique using real robot in the presence of real world conditions such as wind and current. We also show that our proposed approach is suitable for visual surveying by presenting a visual collage of the reef.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it