Frequency Domain Wave Equation Inversion and Its Application on the Heterogeneous Reservoir Model Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seismic full waveform inversion seeks to make use of the full information based on full wave field modeling to extract quantitative information from seismograms. Its serious nonlinearity and high dependence on initial velocity model often results in unsatisfactory inversion results in paleo-karsts carbonate reservoir characterized by strong heterogeneity. The paper presents an improved strategy of multi-scale inversion to establish velocity field model of waveform tomography. the forward wave equation algorithm was derived in frequency domain, and then the Matrix formalism for the iterative inverse methods is derived by gradient methods to speed up calculation and to avoid convergence to local minimum value. After massive amount of frequencies tests, the appropriate bandwidth are extracted, and the velocity field calculated at low frequency is used as the input of the high frequency. After the iteration, the accurate velocity field is inverted. Finally, frequency domain wave equation full waveform inversion in mathematical and physical models is conducted in order to verify the inverse program. The method of selecting the inverse frequencies is proved to be effective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".