Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper aims to account for city-twinning by focusing on the narratives employed and through a highlighting of its affective rather than instrumental aspects. At large, city-twinning is approached as an ideal case, one premised on togetherness and a desire to be like the other. It is noted that the pairing of cities engaged in twinning comes into being through an emphasis on similarity instead of being constituted against the other and with stress on difference as has usually been the case in the sphere of relations extending beyond national borders. These unconventional features integral to twinning as an identity that satisfies emotive desires of belonging are explored by drawing on the concepts of friendship and love. Both are arguably helpful in clarifying what city-twinning is about as a relational form of being in pointing to an opening up and moving beyond the ordinary through the establishment of we-ness and an embracing of the other, although love rests on togetherness and obliterates difference far more thoroughly than does friendship.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it