MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2567578782 · doi:10.12927/cjnl.2016.24896

Nurse Practitioner Practice and Controlled Substances in Ontario: Current Practice and Future Intent

2016· article· en· W2567578782 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Rola Moghabghab, Michael Hamilton-Jones, Rosanne Jabbour, Angela McNabb, Erin Tilley

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing leadership · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSafe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nurses AssociationRegistered Nurses' Association of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingNurse practitionersNursing practicePsychologyMedicineBusinessHealth carePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

= 781). A total of 529 NPs (37%) responded to the survey. The majority of respondents (71%) reported that they would prescribe controlled substances if they were given the legal authority. This was more prominent for NPs working in specialized practice (79%) compared with those working in generalist practice (66%). Most NPs (64%) indicated they would require additional education to gain the competence to prescribe controlled substances. The most common educational needs identified were related to pharmacotherapy, jurisprudence and the knowledge to assess and manage the unique risks associated with controlled substances, such as addiction, diversion and misuse. As NP authority to prescribe controlled substances is implemented across Canada, these survey results may help inform regulatory bodies, educators, employers and NPs in establishing mechanisms and policies to support safe, ethical and effective client care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing leadershipSame topicSafe Handling of Antineoplastic DrugsFrench-language works237,207