An Unusual Association of Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis, Pyoderma Gangrenosum, and Takayasu Arteritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the Editor: Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) is hypothesized to be an autoimmune disorder because of its association with multiple autoimmune diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, acne, pustulosis, Sweet syndrome, dyserythropoietic anemia, pyoderma gangrenosum (PG), sclerosing cholangitis, inflammatory arthritis, Still disease, Takayasu arteritis (TA), Ollier disease, and dermatomyositis1,2. PG association with TA is rare; however, Ujiie, et al showed that PG is associated with TA in 33% of patients3. Occurrence of all 3 conditions together (CRMO, PG, and TA) is very rarely reported. A 10-year-old girl born to nonconsanguineous parents presented with a history of intermittent swelling over the right side of the mandible, associated with pain and claudication pain over legs and back with breathlessness on exertion for the past 2 years. She also developed ulcerative cauliflower-like skin lesions over the dorsum of left foot over the past 2 months (Figure 1). On examination, her pulses were absent … Address correspondence to Dr. S. Kumar, Christian Medical College, Department of Pediatrics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632004, India. E-mail: sathishkumar{at}cmcvellore.ac.in
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".