MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2567632073 · doi:10.1109/camad.2016.7790331

An efficient method for mobile big data transfer over HetNet in emerging 5G systems

2016· article· en· W2567632073 on OpenAlexafffund
Richa Siddavaatam, Isaac Woungang, Glaucio H. S. Carvalho, Alagan Anpalagan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingHeterogeneous networkBig dataDistributed computingExploitWirelessMobile deviceLatency (audio)User equipmentData transmissionMobile cloud computingComputer networkWireless networkBase stationData miningTelecommunicationsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, mobile cloud computing (MCC) has arisen as a promising technology to augment the user equipment (UE)' capabilities in emerging 5G systems by wirelessly transferring the computation-burden from it to the resource-rich cloud computing centers. In this setting, the massive data transfer over a standalone wireless network becomes a challenging task due to the expected increased latency over the wireless channels associated with the remote cloud data centers. This paper proposes an efficient data transfer method for mobile big data along with a data correction technique to cope with the problem of failure to retrieve the data chunks in the cloud. The proposed algorithm exploits the overlapping feature of heterogeneous wireless networks (HetNets) to expedite the mobile big data transfer between the UE and the cloud by splitting the data into a number of smaller chunks which are transmitted simultaneously over the wireless links. Simulation results are provided, showing that our proposed method outperforms the baseline data storage method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207