MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2567721228 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2016.2638823

A New Turbo Equalizer Conditioned on Estimated Channel for MIMO MMSE Receiver

2016· article· en· W2567721228 on OpenAlexafffund
Cheng Li, Fan Jiang, Chuiyang Meng, Zijun Gong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTurbo equalizerMinimum mean square errorTurboEqualization (audio)Computer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Turbo codeBit error rateMIMOAutocorrelationAlgorithmA priori and a posterioriAdaptive equalizerCovariance matrixControl theory (sociology)MathematicsDecoding methodsStatisticsTelecommunicationsBlock codeConcatenated error correction codeArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we propose a new equalization scheme based on minimum mean-square error (MMSE) criteria with a channel estimation error. Different from the existing work on linear MMSE receivers, we consider both the a priori information and channel estimation error in the equalizer design, and re-derive the soft output extrinsic information used for the channel decoder. Conditioned on the estimated channel, we developed the new autocorrelation and covariance matrix of the received vector, which are used to derive the equalizer coefficients. One of our major contributions of this letter is a general expression of the MMSE-based turbo equalization to account for both the channel estimation error and the a priori information, which is not presented in the literature. Simulation results show that significant performance improvement can be achieved with the proposed turbo equalizer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207