MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Effect of Age in the Association Between Frailty and Poor Sleep Quality in Community-Dwellers (The Atahualpa Project) (I9.009)

2016· article· en· W2567733371 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pablo R. Castillo, Kristen Cagino, Robertino M. Mera, Johnathan Nieves, Marleni F. Milla-Martinez, Mauricio Zambrano, Kathryn Fanning, Mark J. Sedler, Oscar Del Brutto

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep qualityGerontologyAssociation (psychology)Sleep (system call)MedicinePsychologyPsychiatryInsomniaComputer sciencePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: We aimed to assess the effect of age in the association between poor sleep quality and frailty status. Background: The link between frailty and sleep disorders is plausible since both conditions are associated with enhanced expression of inflammatory biomarkers and dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis. Studies assessing frailty and disturbed sleep have used age as a confounding variable for adjustment in regression models, but there is no information on the effect of increasing age in this relationship. Design/Methods: Out of 351 Atahualpa residents aged ≥60 years identified during a door-to-door survey, 311 (89[percnt]) were interviewed with the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS). The independent association between PSQI and EFS scores was evaluated by the use of a generalized linear model adjusted for relevant confounders. A contour plot with Shepard interpolation was constructed to assess the effect of age in this association. Results: Mean score in the PSQI was 5 ± 2 points, with 34[percnt] individuals classified as poor sleepers. Mean score in the EFS was 5 ± 3 points, with 46[percnt] individuals classified as robust, 23[percnt] as pre-frail, and 31[percnt] as frail. In the fully adjusted model, higher scores in the PSQI were significantly associated with higher scores in the EFS (β: 0.23; 95[percnt] C.I.: 0.11-0.35; p<0.0001). Several clusters depicted the strong effect of age in the association between PSQI and EFS scores. Older individuals were more likely to be pre-frail or frail and poor sleepers, and younger individuals were more often robust and good sleepers. Clusters of younger individuals who were poor sleepers and frail accounted for the independent association between PSQI and EFS scores. Conclusions: This study shows the strong effect of age in the association between poor sleep quality and frailty status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology→Same topicFrailty in Older Adults→French-language works237,207→