Switching time domain passivity control for multilateral teleoperation systems under time varying delays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Time domain passivity control, a well known control scheme widely used for teleoperation systems, normally works under the constraint of zero division. Small force or velocity signals can cause the occurrence of zero division which ultimately leads the system to be unstable. This paper presents a novel switching time domain passivity control scheme for multilateral teleoperation systems which not only ensures the stability of the system but also avoids zero division. In contrast to bilateral teleoperation systems, the multilateral teleoperation system is much more complex as it involves increased number of master and slave hardware, multiple operators and transmission of multiple signals over the communication network. A new framework for the communication channel has been proposed which incorporates the use of weighting coefficients to give masters and slaves authority depending upon the requirements of the operation. As the switching time domain passivity control keeps the system passive all the time, the stability is guaranteed. The proposed control scheme is valid for n masters and n slaves. Simulations with two masters and two slaves are carried out to verify the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".