MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2567799890 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2016.7793780

Loss minimization of two stage solar powered speed sensorless vector controlled induction motor drive for water pumping

2016· article· en· W2567799890 on OpenAlexaff
Bhim Singh, Saurabh Shukla, Ambrish Chandra, Kamal Al‐Haddad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduction motorControl theory (sociology)Vector controlPhotovoltaic systemMaximum power principleVoltageMATLABComputer scienceWater pumpingPower (physics)MinificationEngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with a two stage solar photovoltaic (SPV) fed speed sensorless vector controlled induction motor drive (IMD) for water pumping system which is superior to conventional controlled motor as it is cheaper and reliable. One common practice is to estimate the flux from the terminal voltages and currents. The performance of the drive depends on the accuracy of the flux estimator. Usually the efficiency of the induction motor drive (IMD) is high around the rated load and deteriorates at partial loading. However, the efficiency can be enhanced by operating the motor at optimum flux by controlling the flux component of current. In this paper, a minimization technique is proposed to minimize the total losses to operate the drive at maximum efficiency. A modified perturb and observe (P&O) algorithm is used to track maximum power from SPV array. The smooth starting of the motor is attained by vector control of an induction motor. The system performance is simulated in MATLAB/Simulink environment and the results are compared with the conventional vector controlled IMD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.864

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207