Por una epistemología de la deportación española. El legado KL Reich de Joaquim Amat-Piniella
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El abordaje crítico de KL Reich (1963) del escritor catalán Joaquim Amat-Piniella no puede pasar por alto el hecho de que sea el libro en su calidad de símbolo más que el texto literario el que haya encontrado su lugar dentro de los iconos que representan la memoria de los españoles deportados a los campos nazis cuya memorialización está estructurada alrededor de unos lugares comunes que se han mantenido inamovibles hasta la fecha. El presente artículo ofrece una breve trayectoria de la recepción de KL Reich a la luz de estos lugares comunes que configuran la articulación entre recepción y representación memorial. Terminaré por señalar una de las aportaciones literarias de KL Reich que pueden servir para ir elaborando una epistemología de la deportación española en los campos nazis. Palabras clave: KL Reich; Joaquim Amat-Piniella; deportación; españoles en Mauthausen; literatura campos concentración.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".