MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2568146290 · doi:10.19044/esj.2016.v12n36p1

Reflectance Spectrum of a Color Blue Generated by Curved Multilayer and Iridescent of the Elytron of the Calidea Signata Bug

2016· article· en· W2568146290 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Issaka Ouedraogo, Serge Wendsida Igo, Priscilla Simonis, Alioune Ouédraogo, Belkacem Zeghmati

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Scientific Journal ESJ · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPolytechnique Montréal
KeywordsIridescenceStructural colorationReflectivityOpticsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPhysicsPhotonic crystal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the study of the origins of blue iridescent reflections of the elytron of Calidea Signata, of the pentatomidae family which is commonly known as bug. Indeed, we use the spectrophotometry measurements, scanning electron microscopy characterization technique, and a ray tracing code program combined with the transfer matrices method, to explain the structure which is responsible for the color of the blue reflections and the iridescent effect. Thus, we noticed that the color of the bug as a result of two peaks. The first and main peak is located at 485.5 nm, corresponding to the blue color. The second peak, is less intense at 525 nm, corresponding to the green-blue color. The numerical reproduction of the reflectance spectrum gives 510.25 nm for the main peak, and 539.5 nm for the secondary peak. These results confirm that the multilayer structure is responsible for the blue color of the Calidea Signata bug. Lastly, the curve of the multilayer is responsible for the iridescence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Scientific Journal ESJSame topicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207