MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2568183437 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2016.7793616

Cascaded multilevel inverter topology with high frequency galvanic isolation for grid connected PV system

2016· article· en· W2568183437 on OpenAlexaff
Abdullah M. Noman, Khaled E. Addoweesh, Kamal Al‐Haddad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalvanic isolationMaximum power point trackingPhotovoltaic systemInverterSolar micro-inverterElectronic engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringConvertersVoltageElectrical engineeringComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Transformer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cascaded H-bridge MLI is an attractive solution for grid connected PV system. DC sources can be replaced by PV module/panel and due to the separated DC link feature and the voltage control becomes possible. Thus, individual maximum power point tracking (MPPT) control in each PV module can be achieved, and the total power extracted from PV panels will be maximized and hence the efficiency improves In this paper, a single phase cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter topology is proposed for grid connected PV system. The proposed multilevel inverter configuration consists of PV modules, each is connected to one DC-DC flyback converter to achieve best MPPT as well as used for galvanic isolation in order to improve system efficiency. The DC-DC flyback converters are cascaded to amplify the DC voltage in order to be used for medium and high voltage systems and the result output voltage is used as an input to one H-bridge inverter. H-bridge inverters are then cascaded to generate multilevel output voltage. On the other hand, the operation of H-bridge MOSFETS is that the two upper MOSFETS are operating at line frequency while the two lower MOSFETS are operating at switching frequency. This will reduce switching losses and hence extra improving system efficiency can be achieved. Finally, the proposed configuration improves the system efficiency due to the multilevel inverter, obtain the best MPPT, achieve isolation at high frequency, eliminating the leakage current due to parasitic capacitances between PV module and ground, decupling the second harmonic voltage ripple and reducing the switching losses in the inverters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207