MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2568424545 · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa708e

Methods, analysis, and the treatment of systematic errors for the electron electric dipole moment search in thorium monoxide

2017· article· en· W2568424545 on OpenAlexaff
John A. Baron, Wesley C. Campbell, David DeMille, John M. Doyle, G. Gabrielse, Yulia V. Gurevich, Paul Hess, Nicholas R. Hutzler, Emil Kirilov, Ivan Kozyryev, Brendon O'Leary, Cristian D. Panda, Maxwell F. Parsons, B. Spaun, Amar C. Vutha, Adam West, Elizabeth West

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Journal of Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersDivision of PhysicsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsDipoleMoment (physics)ThoriumMonoxideElectric dipole momentElectronSystematic errorQuantum electrodynamicsNuclear physicsQuantum mechanicsStatisticsUranium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methods, analysis, and the treatment of systematic errors for the electron electric dipole moment search in thorium monoxide, Baron, J, Campbell, W C, DeMille, D, Doyle, J M, Gabrielse, G, Gurevich, Y V, Hess, P W, Hutzler, N R, Kirilov, E, Kozyryev, I, O’Leary, B R, Panda, C D, Parsons, M F, Spaun, B, Vutha, A C, West, A D, West, E P, Collaboration, ACME

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.046
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.157
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0460.157
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Journal of PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207