MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2568443735 · doi:10.18192/uojm.v6i2.1811

The borders that remain: prevention of cervical cancer in refugee and immigrant women in Canada

2016· article· en· W2568443735 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Matthew Beckett

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa Journal of Medicine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCervical cancerRefugeeVaccinationImmigrationSocioeconomic statusCervixFamily medicineCervical screeningEthnic groupPopulationCancerCancer screeningCervical cancer screeningGynecologyCINAHLDemographyEnvironmental healthImmunologyNursingPolitical scienceInternal medicinePsychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACTObjectives: Cancer of the uterine cervix is primarily caused by infection of human papillomavirus (HPV), and annually results in the deaths of 266,000 women worldwide. Screening for cervical cancer, predominantly via Papanicolau (Pap) tests, has tremendously reduced cervical cancer morbidity and mortality in many developed countries, Canada included. Vaccination against HPV also shows great potential as a preventative measure. Unfortunately, refugee and recently immigrated women are among the least likely to par­ticipate in screening or vaccination at rates recommended by national and provincial guidelines. To gain insight into the barriers faced by refugee women in their access to preventative measures against cervical cancer, it is imperative that we understand the current state of screening and vaccination in this population, and the cultural and systemic barriers by which they are affected.Methods: To gather information on prevention of cervical cancer in refugee women in Canada, three databases were searched: PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. A total of thirteen studies were analyzed, as well as eight other supplemental resources.Results: Rates of cervical cancer screening among refugee and immigrant women were consistently lower than those recommended by provincial guidelines. However, little research dedicated to analyzing HPV vaccination rates of refugees exists. Predictors of low screening and vaccination rates included low socioeconomic factors, recent entry into Canada, and lack of proficiency in English, whereas indicators of screening participation include longer duration spent in Canada, proficiency in English, and access to female physicians and physicians of a similar ethnic background. Screening rates were notably high in an Ontario facility that offers multidisci­plinary support to refugees. Furthermore, a study in the Netherlands has drawn attention to the cultural differences that can act as a barrier to HPV vaccination for immigrants and refugees in Western countries.Conclusions: Preventative health care initiatives should consider the barriers specific to the population at which they are aimed, and work in close collaboration with multidisciplinary settlement services. Further research regarding HPV vaccination rates among refugees in Canada is also required. In light of the current global refugee crisis, applying the insight gained from this research to the incoming Syrian refugee population will be of vital importance. RÉSUMÉObjectifs: Le cancer du col de l’utérus est causé principalement par le virus du papillome humain (VPH), et est responsable du décès de 266 000 femmes annuellement à l’échelle mondiale. Le dépistage du cancer du col de l’utérus, notamment avec le frottis de Pa­panicolaou (test Pap), a vastement réduit la morbidité et la mortalité dues au cancer du col utérin dans plusieurs pays développés, incluant le Canada. La vaccination contre le VPH démontre aussi un grand potentiel en tant que mesure préventive. Malheureusement, les femmes réfugiées et les femmes ayant récemment immigré sont parmi les moins susceptibles de participer au dépistage et à la vaccination aux taux recommandés par les lignes directrices nationales et provinciales. Pour mieux comprendre les obstacles auxquels font face les femmes réfugiées en ce qui a trait à l’accès aux mesures préventives contre le cancer du col utérin, il est impératif de com­prendre l’état actuel du dépistage et de la vaccination de cette population, et les obstacles culturels et systémiques qui les affectent.Méthodes: Pour rassembler de l’information sur la prévention du cancer du col de l’utérus chez les femmes réfugiées au Canada, trois bases de données ont été examinées : PubMed, CINAHL et Web of Science. Un total de treize études ont été analysées, ainsi que huit autres ressources supplémentaires.Résultats: Les taux de dépistage du cancer du col de l’utérus parmi les femmes réfugiées et immigrantes étaient invariablement plus bas que ceux recommandés par les lignes directrices provinciales. Toutefois, il existe peu de recherche dévouée à l’analyse des taux de vaccination contre le VPH chez les réfugiés. Les facteurs prédictifs de faibles taux de dépistage et de vaccination incluent les facteurs socio-économiques faibles, l’arrivée récente au Canada et le manque de compétence en anglais, tandis que les indicateurs prédictifs de participation au dépistage incluent un plus long séjour au Canada, la maîtrise de l’anglais, et l’accès à des femmes médecins et des médecins d’origine ethnique similaire. Les taux de dépistage étaient particulièrement élevés dans un établissement ontarien offrant du soutien multidisciplinaire aux réfugiés. En outre, une étude aux Pays-Bas a attiré l’attention sur les différences culturelles pouvant agir comme obstacle à la vaccination contre le VPH pour les immigrants et réfugiés dans les pays occidentaux.Conclusions: Les initiatives de soins de santé préventifs devraient considérer les obstacles précis auxquels fait face la population ciblée, et devraient travailler en étroite collaboration avec les services multidisciplinaires d’établissement. Plus de recherche sur les taux de vaccination contre le VPH parmi les réfugiés au Canada est également nécessaire. À la lumière de l’actuelle crise mondiale de réfugiés, l’application des connaissances acquises par l’entremise de cette recherche à la population de nouveaux réfugiés syriens sera d’importance vitale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Ottawa Journal of MedicineSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207