Evaluation of Bleeding Symptoms in Children with An Inherited Mucocutaneous Bleeding Disorder.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 1292 Poster Board I-314 Introduction Accurate assessment of bleeding symptoms is an essential step in the diagnosis of an inherited mucocutaneous bleeding disorder (IMBD). This is difficult in childhood when symptoms such as bruising and epistaxis are frequently noted in normal children. In addition, children may not have been exposed to hemostatic challenges such assurgery, dental extraction and menarche. Knowledge of the spectrum of presenting features of an IMBD may aid diagnosis. The MCMDM-1 VWD Bleeding Questionnaire, which uses a symptom-specific grade of -1 to 4 (Tosetto et al., J Thromb Haemost 2006:4;766), was recently modified for use in a pediatric population by inclusion of questions related to pediatric-specific bleeding symptoms. The Pediatric Bleeding Questionnaire (PBQ) has been validated in the assessment of bleeding symptoms in children and a score of 2 or greater predicts a diagnosis of VWD (Bowman et al., J Thromb Haemost 2009; doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03499.x). This present study applied the PBQ to a cohort of children with a prior diagnosis of an IMBD in order to evaluate the prevalence and severity of specific bleeding symptoms. Patients and Methods The PBQ was used to determine bleeding score for 123 children with a prior diagnosis of VWD or a platelet function disorder (PFD) at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, or Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, by interview of parents/children. A clinically-significant bleeding symptom was defined as one severe enough to require consultation with a healthcare professional, medical/surgical intervention or blood transfusion. Results 100 children had a diagnosis of VWD and 23, a PFD (Glanzmann thrombasthenia: 4; dense granule deficiency: 9; MYH9-related disease: 3; Noonan syndrome: 2; Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: 2; undefined PFD: 3). 65 were male and 58 female with a median age of 10.7 years (range: 0.6-18). Mean bleeding score was 8.3 for the entire cohort (range: 0-29) and varied between diagnostic groups (definite type 1 VWD: 9.5 (range: 2-18); possible type 1 VWD: 3.0 (range: 0-15); type 2 VWD: 11.8 (range: 3-17); type 3 VWD: 14.6 (range: 4-29); PFD: 9.5 (range: 1-20). The prevalence of each of the bleeding symptoms is shown in Table 1. The most frequent clinically-significant bleeding symptoms in the cohort were: menorrhagia, 57% (of menstruating females); epistaxis, 36%; prolonged bleeding from minor wounds, 35%; and bleeding after tooth extraction, 30%. The most frequent clinically-significant bleeding symptoms did not vary greatly between each of the diagnostic groups but oral cavity bleeding, hemarthrosis, gastrointestinal bleeding and hematoma were more frequent in children with type 3 VWD. All symptoms were less frequent in children with possible type 1 VWD. Menorrhagia was a prevalent symptom in menstruating females in all diagnostic groups. Clinically-significant pediatric-specific bleeding symptoms were seen in 20% of children. The most frequent were: post-circumcision bleeding, 35% (of circumcised males); cephalohematoma, 7%; macroscopic hematuria, 4%; and umbilical stump bleeding, 3%. These symptoms occurred most frequently in children with type 3 VWD, type 2 VWD or PFD. Conclusions Children with an IMBD frequently report menorrhagia, epistaxis, prolonged bleeding from minor wounds and bleeding after tooth extraction. Pediatric-specific bleeding symptoms also occur. There are differences in prevalence of symptoms between subtypes of VWD and PFDs. This information can assist the evaluation of children with bleeding symptoms. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".