Language Appropriation and Identity Construction in New Religious Movements: Peoples Temple as Test Case
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Journal Article Language Appropriation and Identity Construction in New Religious Movements: Peoples Temple as Test Case Get access Kristian Klippenstein Kristian Klippenstein *Kristian Klippenstein, Interdisciplinary Studies, 400 Arts and Convocation Hall, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB, T6G 2E6, Canada. E-mail: kdklippe@ualberta.ca. I am grateful to Michael Gillingham, Paige Larsen, Peter Sabo, and my three anonymous reviewers for their comments and criticisms of this article. I would also like to thank David Sulz at the University of Alberta Libraries (for providing access to selected secondary sources) and Dr. Stephen Kent at the University of Alberta (for editorial remarks, and for access to Scientology and Children of God sources housed within the Stephen A. Kent Collection on Alternative Religions). Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Volume 85, Issue 2, June 2017, Pages 348–380, https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfw082 Published: 04 January 2017
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".