Investigation of Engine Performance at Altitude Using Selected Alternative Fuels for the National Jet Fuels Combustion Program
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The National Research Council Canada (NRC) is an allied partner in the National Jet Fuels Combustion Program (NJFCP), which is a US multi-agency program led by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). NJFCP aims to accelerate the ASTM International fuel approval process for alternative jet fuels (AJF) by conducting combustion-related testing and modelling to gain a better understanding of the effect of AJF on engine combustion. In support of NJFCP, NRC has undertaken studies on a turbojet engine to investigate the effect of various fuels on engine ignition at simulated altitude conditions. One baseline conventional petroleum derived jet fuel with “average” physical properties and three test fuels meant to represent AJF with unique characteristics were tested. Significant differences were observed in the ignition performance of the fuels. Despite the test fuel having very different chemical compositions, the fuel physical properties appear to have the predominant influence on the ignition performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".