MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2568780204 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2016.2638428

Frequency-Domain Integral Equations of Scattering for Complex Scalar Responses

2017· article· en· W2568780204 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexander S. Beaverstone, Denys S. Shumakov, Natalia K. Nikolova

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIntegral equationScalar (mathematics)Frequency domainScattering parametersScatteringMathematical analysisScalar fieldPhysicsReflection coefficientElectromagnetic fieldMagnitude (astronomy)Computational electromagneticsMicrowave imagingOpticsMicrowaveMathematicsGeometryClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A rigorous frequency-domain forward model of scattering is derived that relates any desired complex-valued scalar response to the vectors of the electromagnetic field. The model is valid in any reciprocal medium. The S-parameter forward model is derived as a special case. The forward model for the open-circuit voltage at the terminals of a receiving antenna is also given. The proposed model is useful in microwave imaging since it eliminates the need to employ inadequate approximations of: 1) Green's dyadic function and 2) the relation between the field in the antenna vicinity and its response. As a validation, the magnitude and phase distributions of fields are mapped using a small scattering probe in reflection-coefficient measurements. The maps contain both the magnitude and the phase distributions. The application of the proposed model in imaging is also demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207