MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2568912749 · doi:10.1177/002196570705000313

The Marxist and Christian Views of the Nature of Man

2007· article· en· W2568912749 on OpenAlex
Harold Fallding

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Christian Education · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Economy and Marxism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarxist philosophyParallelism (grammar)ChristianityEpistemologyPresentation (obstetrics)Point (geometry)PhilosophyAestheticsSociologyReligious studiesPoliticsPolitical scienceLawMathematicsLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comparing the Marxist and Christian views of man is a fascinating exercise because of the parallelism between them. If we explore them via that parallelism we are made to realize how far apart they are. Yet in one popular estimate Marxism and Christianity are taken to be just about bedfellows! This presentation therefore is planned to lead up to that question. The basic parallel between the views is that both consider that man, at the point where they each discover him, is not truly himself. Something has got in the way of his fulfilment in authentic selfhood. Yet both are optimistic about the outcome, for they consider that a way to that is open. Man is fallen, but may be restored—and, indeed, shall be.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it