Book Reviews / Revues de livre: General Psychiatry: Nidotherapy: Harmonising the Environment with the Patient
Bibliographic record
Abstract
maintenant âgée de 25 ans et de nombreux écrits ont été publiés depuis ce temps.Il nous semble donc que pour un sujet aussi important, le lecteur reste sur sa faim.Cet ouvrage ne vise pas particulièrement le grand public, car le discours exige des connaissances préalables, dont un certain degré de maîtrise de notions de base des théories psychodynamiques.Il s'agit d'une revue pour un auditoire professionnel qui souhaite porter une réflexion plus approfondie sur les motivations sous-tendant le geste agressif ou violent et enrichir sa compréhension d'autant.Comme l'indique l'auteur, les profits générés par la vente du livre seront versés à la Fondation Docteur Philippe-Pinel, dont la mission consiste à appuyer financièrement et techniquement la prévention de la violence à l'échelle du Québec.Le geste est admirable.Bibliographie 1. Nivoli GC.Lo schizofrenico omicidae e la sua vittima.Studi Sassaresi.1974;52(Suppl).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".