Water sorption hysteresis in wood: II mathematical modeling – functions beyond data fitting
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Preisach model, the mathematical form of the independent domain model, has been used to describe water sorption hysteresis in wood for over 20 years, however, its geometric interpretation has not been fully explored. In this work, it is demonstrated that the geometric interpretation can be used to explain the five experimental hysteresis patterns identified in the first paper of this series. Additionally, a modification to the aforementioned model is suggested that involves a numerical implementation, which avoids the use of unknown parameters. Our approach was evaluated at 25 and 40°C by comparing the predicted 1 st to 4 th order scanning curves with experimental data for Douglas-fir, western red cedar and Aspen. The low prediction errors and well-maintained wiping-out property support the suitability of our approach. Compared to other models found in literature, the presented model has the advantage of high accuracy and easy implementation due to its nonparametric nature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it