MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

New Fine Structure within the Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Compartment Revealed by Longterm Analysis of Mice Repopulated with Single Cells or Their In Vitro Generated Clonal Progeny.

2005· article· en· W2569224204 on OpenAlexaff
Brad Dykstra, David G. Kent, Lindsay McCaffrey, Kristin Lyons, Merete Kristiansen, Melisa J. Hamilton, Connie J. Eaves

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaematopoiesisBiologyMyeloidStem cellImmunologyIn vitroTransplantationIn vivoRepopulationMolecular biologyAndrologyCell biologyGeneticsInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Assessments of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) repopulating activity in vivo have historically relied on calculated average longterm (12–16 wk) progeny outputs using non-purified transplants, thereby precluding definitive clonal assignments of donor-derived cells. Viral marking circumvents this problem, but has not been used for large scale surveys. Heterogeneity observed in the repopulation patterns has generally been inferred to reflect stochastic processes. We now report the in vivo repopulation kinetics of 89 individual longterm repopulating cells (LTRCs) before (n=49) and after (n=40) 4 days of clonal growth in vitro. LTRCs were defined here as cells whose WBC progeny could be detected at levels of ≥1% for at least 16 wk in sublethally irradiated Ly5-congenic W41/W41 hosts. Recipients were transplanted with either freshly isolated, single lin−Rho−SP LTRCs or 4-day clones generated from similar cells in serum-free cultures (+ 300 ng/ml SF, 20 ng/ml IL-11 & 1ng/ml Flt3-L). 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 wk post-transplant, blood samples were stained for donor-derived B, T, and myeloid cells using a procedure that identifies donor/recipient doublets and Ly6g/Mac1low cells (which have features of lymphoid rather than myeloid WBCs) to exclude false-positive myeloid events. Four distinct patterns of repopulation were revealed. Type 1 showed a delayed production of predominantly myeloid WBCs (low or undetectable before 12 wk) that increased progressively (reaching 0.4–15% of all WBCs by 16 wk). Type 2 showed a robust multilineage repopulation that remained stable or increased over time (6–84% of all WBCs at 16 wk). Type 3 also showed an initially robust pattern of multilineage repopulation (peak numbers of WBCs at 8–12 wk and 1–51% at 16 wk), but the contribution of donor-derived myeloid cells was transient (<0.5% by 16 wk). Type 4 showed a lymphoid-restricted pattern (myeloid contribution <0.5% at all time points), with repopulation levels peaking at 8 wk and decreasing thereafter (1–22% at 16 wk). Persisting granulopoiesis, indicated by a high proportion of donor-derived cells in the Ly6g/Mac1+SSChi population at 16–24 wk, clearly distinguished the type 1 and 2 patterns from types 3 and 4 which showed near or complete cessation of donor-derived granulopoiesis beyond 12 wk. Preliminary secondary transplant experiments show that donor-derived LTRCs (with and without longterm granulopoietic activity) were exclusively generated in primary recipients with type 1 and 2 repopulation patterns. Amongst the freshly isolated LTRCs, 18% (9/49) were type 1, 41% (20/49) were type 2, 22% (11/49) were type 3, and 18% (9/49) were type 4. In contrast, 4-day clones derived from cells of the same phenotype and containing LTRC activity showed a marked decrease in type 1 and type 2 activity with a corresponding increase in type 3 and type 4 activity: type 1 = 5% (2/41), type 2 = 18% (7/40), type 3 = 28% (11/40) and type 4 = 50% (20/40). Collectively, these data identify a new hierarchy of four biologically discrete states within the compartment of cells currently defined as LTRCs. Proliferation of LTRCs either in vitro or in vivo appears to induce an irreversible transition from one state to another (from Type 1 to 2 to 3 to 4), suggesting the existence of intrinsic molecular correlates for each of these states and specific mechanisms that underlie their sequential appearance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→French-language works237,207→