Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial of EPO with or without G-CSF Versus Supportive Therapy Alone in the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): Results of the ECOG- CLSG Trial(E1996).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract MDS are a heterogeneous group of clonal disorders characterized by the development of one or more symptomatic cytopenias. We evaluated the role of erythropoietin (EPO) with or without granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for the treatment of anemic patients with MDS. Patients with refractory anemia (RA n=40), RA with ringed sideroblasts( RARS n=36), and RA with excess blasts (RAEB n= 29) were initially randomized to either supportive therapy (ST) or EPO, 150 u/kg/d. Patients on the ST arm could cross over to the EPO arm if after at least a 4 month period of observation they had a ≥ 50% increase in their transfusion requirement. In patients who did not respond to or did not maintain their response to EPO( 150 u/kg) , G-CSF, 1mcg/kg/d was administered in addition to the EPO. Patients who did not respond after 4 months received an increased dose of EPO at 300u/kg/d + G-CSF. Bone marrow studies and iron stores were evaluated before each change in treatment. Response criteria were CR (complete response), GR (good erythroid response), which required a sustained increase of the pre-transfused Hgb value of > 2 g/dl or loss of the transfusion requirement or PR (partial response), defined as a decrease in the transfusion requirement by ≥ 50% or an increase in the Hgb by > 1 g/dl above the pretreatment level. A GR or PR must be sustained for at least 4 months. Transformation to acute leukemia was defined as ≥ 30% blasts in the bone marrow. 118 patients were enrolled , 109( 53 EPO, 56 ST) were eligible and 105 were evaluable for response. The median age was 73 (range 37–88 years). The response rate (CR+GR+PR) in the EPO arm was 35% vs. 9% in the ST arm (p=. 002). Of the 23 patients who crossed over from the ST arm, 30% responded to EPO (GR+PR). Six of 27 patients (22%) who received EPO 150u/kg + G-CSF responded (CR+GR+PR). Ten patients received EPO 300 u/kg + G-CSF and 6(60%) responded (CR+GR+PR). Transformation to acute leukemia occurred in 3.6% and 0% in the supportive therapy and EPO arm respectively( P=.50). A complete response (CR) was documented in 2 patients, 1 each on EPO and EPO+G-CSF. There was a survival difference for patients who had an erythroid response: median survival 53 months for responders vs 26 months for non-responders (p=.009). Neither EPO nor the addition of G-CSF was associated with an increase rate of transformation to acute leukemia. Toxicities were comparable in all the treatment arms. The pretreatment serum EPO level correlated with the response to treatment (P=.004): median EPO of 48 vs. 140 mu/ml for responders versus non-responders. Responses were observed in all subtypes. Responses were greater in RA>RARS>RAEB. In conclusion, EPO administration was associated with a significant increase in Hgb and a decrease in the transfusion requirement in anemic patients with MDS. Low doses of G-CSF + EPO were effective in EPO nonresponsive or refractory patients. In MDS patients EPO + low dose G-CSF was not associated with progression or transformation to acute leukemia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".